|
Title Page, Preface, Committees, and Table of Contents
PART I – UPDATING LAP
Invited paper: The Struggle with the Language in the IT –
Why is LAP not
in the Mainstream?
Kalle Lyytinen
Case Western Reserve University, U.S.A 3
The generics of business interaction -
emphasizing dynamic features through
the BAT model
Göran Goldkuhl & Mikael Lind
Linköping University and University College of Borås, Sweden 15
Service-oriented Computing: An Opportunity for
the Language-Action Perspective?
Karthikeyan Umapathy & Sandeep Purao
The Pennsylvania State University,
U.S.A 41
Towards
a LAP-based Information Paradigm
Jan L.G. Dietz
Delft University
of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands 59
Universal Actability: Towards an Integral
Understanding of Universal Usability, (Intercultural) Action Competence,
and Information Systems Actability
Fahri Yetim
New Jersey Institute of Technology,
U.S.A 77
Action at the Tables: Sketching a Tabular
Representation for Utterances
under theLanguage/Action Perspective
Steven O. Kimbrough & Yinghui Yang
University of Pennsylvania, U.S.A 103
Using
Speech Act Theory to Model Conversations for Automated
Classification and Retrieval
Douglas P. Twitchell, Mark Adkins, Jay F. Nunamaker Jr. &
Judee K. Burgoon
University of Arizona 121
Felicity
conditions and genre: Linking act and conversation in LAP style
conversation analysis
Mark Aakhus
Rutgers University, USA 131
PART II – MODELLING PARTICIPATION
Invited paper: Designing Online Collaborative
Environments: Social Visualizations as Shared Resources
Thomas Erickson
IBM T. J.
Watson Research
Center, U.S.A 143
Argumentation semantics of
communicative action
Hans Weigand & Aldo de Moor
Tilburg University,
The Netherlands 159
The Worlds of Negotiation
Mareike Schoop
Information
Systems, University of Hohenheim,
Germany 179
An Argumentation Analysis of Weblog
Conversations
Aldo de Moor
Tilburg University, The Netherlands
Lilia Efimova
Telematica
Instituut, The Netherlands 197
The Future of Citizen Participation in the
Electronic State:
Modelling Communicative
Action in E-Rulemaking Practice
Beth Simone Noveck
New York Law School,
U.S.A 213
Structuring Communication Processes and
Enhancing Public Discourse:
The Delphi Method Revisited
Fahri Yetim & Murray
Turoff
New Jersey Institute of Technology,
U.S.A 235
|
