Rutgers New Brunswick/Piscataway Campus

 

 Background on LAP

 

This page includes:

1.       The Language/Action Perspective

2.       From Workshop to Conference – Links to Prior LAP Workshops/Conferences

3.       Background Reading and Assorted LAP Literature Reference Lists

The Language/Action Perspective

The Language/Action Perspective (LAP) introduced in the field of Information Systems by Flores and Ludlow in the early 1980's has proven to be a new basic paradigm for Information Systems Design. In contrast to traditional views of "data flow" the language/action perspective emphasizes what people do while communicating; how they create a common reality by means of language and how communication brings about a coordination of their activities.

Since the 80's, this new paradigm has evolved in the field of information systems. LAP recognizes the importance of communication in an organizational context. Two theories of communication have traditionally formed the theoretical foundations of LAP: Searle's Theory of Speech Acts and Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action. After the pioneering work of Winograd and Flores, a second wave of frameworks, models and systems emerged in the 90s. As diverse as these applications of LAP are, they all have in common the fundamental agreement that language is not only used for exchanging information as in reports, statements etc. but also to perform actions, e.g. promises, orders, declarations.

From Workshop to Working Conference

 

So far, 8 successful gatherings of scholars and practitioners interested in the Language/Action Perspective (LAP) have been held in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Germany and Canada. Last year the traditional workshop format was changed to an international working conference to reflect the level of maturity the LAP field has achieved. Recent proceedings are available at: 

 

·         LAP ’03 – Working Conference – University of Tilburg Infolab 

·         LAP ’03 Proceedings

·         LAP ’02 Proceedings

·         LAP ’01 – Workshop – University of Montreal

·         LAP ’01 Proceedings

·         LAP ’00 – Workshop – Aachen University of Technology

·         LAP ’00 Proceedings

·         LAP ’99 Proceedings

·         LAP ’98 – Workshop – Linkφping University

·         LAP ’98 Proceedings

·         LAP ’97 – Workshop – Veldoven, The Netherlands

·        LAP ’96 – Workshop – University of Tilburg Infolab

 

 

Background Reading

 

In addition to LAP proceedings, there is an extensive background literature available.

 

Data & Knowledge Engineering special issue on LAP contains LAP research based on papers presented at the Montreal ’01 and the Delft ’02 LAP worksops.

 

Egon Verharen at the University of Tilburg’s Infolab created a useful reference list with examples of important LAP articles for the 1996 workshop.  This list is included below.

Language/Action Perspective Literature

First publication on LAP:

Flores, F., J.J. Ludlow, 1980.
Doing and Speaking in the Office
In: G. Fick, H. Spraque Jr. (Eds.). Decision Support Systems: Issues and Challenges, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 95-118.

General overview of application of the language/action perspective:

Winograd, T., F. Flores, 1986.
Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design
Ablex, Norwood.

Coordinator:

Flores, F., M. Graves, B. Hartfield, T. Winograd, 1988.
Computer Systems and the Design of Organizational Interaction
ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 153-172.

Winograd, T., 1988.
A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work
In: I. Greif (ed.), Computer Supported Cooperative Work: A Book of Readings. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.

SAMPO:

Auramδki E, E. Lehtinen, K. Lyytinen, 1988.
A Speech Act Based Office Modeling Approach
ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 6, No 2, pp. 126-152.

Lehtinen, E., K. Lyytinen, 1986.
Action Based Model of Information System
Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 299-317.

Second wave:

De Michelis, G., M.A. Grasso, 1994.
Situating Conversations within the Language/Action Perspective: The Milan Conversation Model
In: CSCW'94, Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York, pp. 89-100.

Dietz, J.L.G., 1994.
Business Modeling for Business Redesign
Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 723-732.

Dietz, J.L.G., 1994.
Modeling Business Processes for the Purpose of Redesign
Proceedings IFIP TC8 Open Conference on Business Process Redesign, Australia, North-Holland, pp. 249-258.

Medina-Mora, R., T. Winograd, R. Flores, F. Flores, 1992.
The Action Workflow Approach to Workflow Management Technology
In: J. Turner, R. Kraut (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, New York.

Janson, M.A., C.C. Woo, 1995.
Comparing IS Development Tools and Methods: Using the Speech Act Theory
Information and Management. Vol. 28, pp. 1-12.

Searle/Habermas debate:

Habermas, J., 1991.
Comments on John Searle: Meaning, Communication and Representation
In: E. Lepore, R. Van Gulick (Eds.), John Searle and his Critics. Blackwell, Cambridge MA, pp. 17-31.
(Searle's reply to Habermas, pp. 89-96).

Dietz, J.L.G., G.A.M. Widdershoven, 1991.
Speech Acts or Communicative Action?
In: L. Bannon, M. Robinson, K. Schmidt (Eds.). Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: ECSCW'91. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Lyytinen, K, R. Hirschheim, 1988.
Information Systems as Rational Discourse: an Application of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Management, Bd 4, Nr.1/2, pp.19-30.

Formal methods:

Johannesson, P., 1995.
Representation and Communication: A Speech Act Based Approach to Information Systems Design
Information Systems, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 291-303.

Dignum, F. , H. Weigand, 1995.
Modelling Communication between Cooperative Systems
Proceedings of CAISE'95.

Weigand, H. , E. Verharen, F. Dignum, 1995.
Integrated Semantics for Information and Communication Systems
Procedings of IFIP DS-6 Database Semantics, Stone Mountain, 1995.

New foundations:

Suchman, L., 1994.
Do Categories have Politics? The Language/Action Perspective Reconsidered
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 2, pp. 177-190.

Winograd, T., 1994.
Categories, Disciplines, and Social Coordination
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 2, pp. 191-197.

Continuation of the debate
In: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 3, pp. 29-95.

Agents:

Verharen, E. M., 1997.
A Language Action perspective on the Design of Cooperative Information Agents
Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Brabant

Workflow Management:

Schael, T., 1996.
Workflow Management Systems for Process Organisations.
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1096, Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

Schael, T., 1997.
Theorie et pratique du workflow - Des processus metier
renouveles. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

Bannon, L.J., 1996.
Use, Design and Evaluation: Steps towards an Integration.
In Shapiro, D.; Tauber, M.; Traunmueller, R. (eds.). The Design of Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam: 423-442

Schael, T., 1996.
System Design for Cooperative Work in the Language/Action Perspective.
In Shapiro, D.; Tauber, M.J.; Traunmueller, R. (eds). The Design of Computer Supported Cooprative Work and Groupware Systems. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam: 377-399

Schael, T.; Zenie, A., 1996.
Analyzing and redesigning a remote sensing business process for rapid estimates of agriculture in Europe.
Information Technology & People, Volume 9, Issue 1, MCB University Press, Bradford: 25-48

Schael, T.; Zeller, B., 1993.
Workflow Management Systems for Financial Services.
In Kaplan, S. (ed.). Conference on Organizational Computing Systems. ACM, New York: 142-153


For additional literature on the Language/Action Perspective, see the websites by the following scholars:

n         Terry Winograd

n         Gφran Goldkuhl  

This list can be extended of course. If you feel an important reference is missing (or you have found an error), please contact us and we'll include it.


 

 

 

 

 

For questions or comments about this site, contact Mark Aakhus
Last Updated: 5/22/2004

© 2003 Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. All rights reserved.