Why are so many television movies bad? Why are they so simplistic? Why are they so uncomplicated?
What are the characters so cliché? The answer is because television executives are stretched thin.
Television executives read 8, 10 scripts on a weekend, read them in the car, read them on airplanes, read
them on boats, read them every goddamn place except sitting down in a nice quiet spot. As soon as you
give them a complicated script, they lose track. They have had three phone calls, they’ve had a drink,
they’ve played some tennis in the middle, and they have lost track of where that argument is going. 263
There are too damn many networks right now. . . . The talent pool was stretched critically before that. It’s always been very hard to staff up your show. Now…..where in the hell are you gonna get the writers and producers to do this? That’s what’s wrong with the quality. I think there just aren’t enough writers. 183
What happens now, is, somebody spends a year or two writing Friends—he’s just been writing, he’s never produced, but they call him a producer, because his talent agent has blackmailed the studio to call him a producer. There’s a proliferation of credit. It’s silly. 184
What about casting? Isn’t it hard to find a comedic lead who’s young and good looking?
They’ve always been hard to find. Historically, it’s the leading man. Never hard at all to find funny, attractive leading women.. . . . Is Ben Affleck going to do television? 183
This [the] group writing concept I just loath. When we were doing the Mary show, of course, all the first ones were all Jim Brooks’ and my image, and we wrote a lot of the scripts in the first year or two. We had a vision, and we knew our characters, what they do, what they wouldn’t do. Now, it’s not unusual for a situation comedy to have 12, 14 writers on staff.. What kind of vision do you get from a group like that? You don’t. You can’t.
I had a very discouraging experience a couple of years ago. I was asked to consult on a show that had been on the air for three years but it was in trouble. It had started out sort of promisingly in its first year, and they sort of got in trouble. And I was asked to come in and help for about five weeks to help them break stories for an upcoming year.
I went in and was amazed at the way it was done, how sloppily the stories were prepared. There was this gang effort, with literally 10 or 12 people around the table, all pitching ideas that were being put into a computer by a writer’s assistant. They were working on a story line, for example, and everybody was pitching, and it would take three or four days, and people would be walking in and out and getting lunch and food, and coming back in. I left at the end of one day to come back to find out that they had abandoned the story that they’d been working on all day for something else because they were having difficulty with this idea. And it was so sloppy, and people were talking about everything else other than what they should have been, they weren’t really concentrating on the effort. People were talking about other shows. 185